Compare the previous version:
A more reasonable circuit layout makes it more reliable and stable. Thickened aluminum alloy bottom shell makes heat dissipation better. Adjust the interface to make it the same as the original VESC. Also: Added high-power TVS, Increase the capacity of the filter capacitor. .and some details optimization…
Not without solid reviews from trusted community members, thousands of miles of varied terrain tested on a hundred different motor and settings combinations.
Once you’ve got that sorted I’ll be happy to jump in
Bought one of these just now, will be posting in my upcoming build thread as soon as a receive it and ill try to do a pretty comprehensive review on it as soon as its in my hands,
@b264 is a big fan of backup plans, redundancy and over all just in case preparation.
His point is (and he asks/demands this for all dual ESCs) that as long as every component is in place 2 times there is no logical reason to replace a full dual unit if one side fails or get damaged. But he also dislikes dual ESC systems with a single MCU for example, as the cost of a second MCU isn’t worth the risk of loosing the controll of both motors in a bad situation.
BTW I personly like the idea to just have one/two PCBs attached by PCB breakpoints and screwed onto one heatsink. If one side fails you can get a new one.