The issue extends beyond just the battery voltage being displayed incorrectly. It is outright dangerous to run stock fw5.1 on your ESC, because it changes the scaling for the current measurement, which in turn has major implications for the FOC algorithm.
I would highly recommend that you make sure it is abundantly clear to your customers that stock firmware is unstable/dangerous on your Spitend Ubox ESC.
The other option would be ensuring that your product is trademark/OS licensure compliant and requesting main branch support through VESC-Project.
Hi, friends
Too busy to response here in time. now share you what I’m busy with recently.
Due to some key chipsets and MOS are stopped supplying(or supplying with a long long lead time), the local supplying stock parts are crazy cost up, I’m busy with searching and buying reliable parts.
Also keep busy with some known project: the BMS, the single Ubox, the 100V ESC
and meantime, shipping and service support for some customers.
Yes, Too many things, and now I really hard to hire a qualified guy that can help me, I do have two sales girl, they help little on this design jobs.
I may response slower here, but I will not disappear.
Have a good day!
I rechecked it today, can’t find any abnormal there. From actual test and feedback in market: The change of 3.44V to 3.3V in the VESC source code solved two problems: 1. battery display discrepancy 2. it well improved overheating .
Surely we welcome market feedback if you’re using my customed firmware, and also the source code is published in my website. when I’m free after Spring festival , it will be submitted to vesc-project.
The most important remind: wear protection well no matter whose products you’re using now.
What I am stating, is that due to this requirement, if a user is unaware & loada stock fw5.1 on your ESC can cause it to become unstable.
The impact of this being incorrectly set is beyond incorrect battery voltage, and can cause unstable/unpredictable behavior in the control algorithm (linked in my previous post).
Does that make sense?
I think it should be made explicitly clear that running stock firmware on these is potentially dangerous.
For me it solved as well high current cut outs.
With stock FW I got ABS overcurrent faults with motor max setting at 130-150A and suddenly hard acceleration from stand still.
With the custom FW (300A Version) I do not have this problem anymore. Running now 140A motor max setting without ABS overcurrent faults.
I have no build in battery. All my packs are removable and interchangeable depending on which ride I want to go. Usually 12s2p-4p 5Ah 60c lipos or 12s10p vtc6 on this setup.
Use canbus cable connect two UBOX by canbus connector.
make the two switch button in parallel. (The power-on signal wire can be welded in parallel on a power-on button, but the LED on the power-on button cannot be welded to two LED signal wires at the same time.)