The Hoyt Puck is incredibly easy to pair, so having a single remote with multiple receivers is definitely doable.
Don’t think the nano-x will work since that remote will bind to whichever board is switched on first or to be more exact receiver that’s on first.
2 Likes
Apparently it is possible to bind a nano x remote to a receiver without it going into auto binding after each time you switch it off and on again.
Just like the mini rc remote you need to short 2 pins on the bind channel (what do you know it does have a purpose) then switch on the remote while holding down the bind button on the side I believe.
@deckoz recently explained this here:
I was quite surprised reading this since none of the enertion instructions that came with the remote mention this.
4 Likes
Because…enertion…
1 Like
Its actually called a bind plug. Hobby shops sell them. Basically a servo plug with said pins looped. Enertion should sell the remote /receiver with it as part of the package but that is testament to how little they actually know about rc communication. Every remote you buy for other RC applications come with a bind plug even if the system is auto bind. Its a way to bypass the auto function should you have issues with pairing.
I just listed some free bind plugs if you need one
Fark multiple receivers, I just want one that’s immune to this.
3 Likes
Use a wired nunchuck remote and a wiiceiver
1 Like
Details?
not concurrently. for safety reasons, the puck can only be paired with one receiver at a time.
3 Likes
OSSR supports multiple receivers.
2 Likes
What is the procedure to set it up?
1 Like
Install two receivers. Use one of these to program them https://www.amazon.com/XBee-USB-Adapter-Communication-Interface/dp/B07NYFBDCG/ref=mp_s_a_1_2?keywords=Waveshare+XBee+USB+Adapter+USB+Communication+Board+with+Xbee+Interface+Supports+XBee+Connectivity&qid=1575516171&sr=8-2 . Vesc tool that shit. Ride redundantly.
3 Likes
I added a note at the top. This is for products supporting it, not for rewriting firmware or reengineering the product.
1 Like
Would this really be any different than having to bind two fancy receivers? Genuine question.
1 Like
No. Brian doesn’t know what he’s talking about. We’re also not talking about old RC remotes that people used in the 90’s. This is technology. We want to be able to control our devices.
1 Like
Im very aware of the technology that you speak of. Im just more curious as to understanding why it would be different. Love to understand who thinks what and why.
1 Like
If one Rx has no signal, the other Rx that has signal sends to the ESCs, or what does this do?
1 Like