main differences are the cutout shape is different, the camber of the lacroix is absent on the flux, and the flux is noticeably larger.
the shapes are similar enough though that you could instinctively make the comparison and not realize the differences unless both right in front of you.
yeah this is the comparison everyone has been drawing. They look MUCH closer to each other than the prototipo.
That said, they are definitely different decks. The Nazare has a much more complex concave pattern, and looks like it would lock in your feet a little better than the Flux deck, which appears to have a much more simple, minimal concave.
The base outlines of both are very similar, however.
I tested both and the Flux has the more comfortable deck for me. I like the larger size and the milder concave. It is also stiffer. The Flux has a slightly chamber as well.
A nice comparison should include various decks (and copycats) from different manufacturers sharing similar camber, concave or flex, the same (or similar) configuration, deck outline, style, size, or category. Let’s say:
Well, certainly its the optics, angle perception or proportions which helps the Flux pretty well because it looks like a more proportional deck than the Lonestar. Is like going out with an ugly chic.
I think is the shape. Looks like a hybrid cross between a hog and a centipede! Colors are . Like a Hot Wheels cast model from the 80’s. Deck profile is not appealing. Hypertrucks are awesome, not worthy of such an ugly board.
I just realized I’ve never seen Hypertrucks on a MBS Comp 95 or Dylan Warren deck yet, I think if someone does that and does tanker batteries it would look dope, or at least very futuristic
Yeah, those aren’t classic carver decks. They’ve usually got bindings and knobbie tires. You might be able to pull it off aesthetically, but I wager it’d ride like poo.
You can put road tires on them, but those decks are holding you back on the road. Would love to see/hear about some hypertruck offroading experience, haha.
.
