“Negative Ramping Time” defaults to 200ms, you can increase this to your liking.
2 Likes
Get a plug that fits the charge port and plug it in, and measure the voltage
Do not stick multimeter prongs in a charge port, ever, no matter how steady your hands are.
You could also open it up and check on the inside using a multimeter.
3 Likes
Yeah, West System 650 works well or any epoxy without metal in it
1 Like
i checked with a multimeter (xt60 charge port) and measured voltage. i eitherway opened it up and the fuse was fine but still changed it just in case.
having some firmware issues though now
From positive throttle down to zero it’s actually “positive ramping time” that affects that time. But unfortunately, increasing positive ramping time for smoothness results in lag for brakes 
Edit: I misread and though Brian was suggesting to increase positive ramping time; it seems like increasing negative ramping time might actually do this.
1 Like
Hold it in your hand 
Seriously, I hold my phone in front of me all the time. Just not for esk8 data typically
You could just drill holes in a cheap phone case lol
3 Likes
im gonna say zipties, but im not responsible to whatever happen next 
2 Likes
Anyone have any idea why aliexpress.com would be cancelling any orders I make with them? I swear the last 4 times I’ve tried to use the website over the past few years they just cancel my order after 2 days and refund me.
I just want some Clever 6X2s and tubes
I just went to buy the $8.99 5.5mm extension wire from DIYESKATEBOARD and my only shipping option is $60USD 
& 
at the same time. Guess I will have to make up my own after all
Took my idea lol
Well that’s no good. I wonder if Vedder would accept a suggestion to separate those two?
1 Like
Is there some kind of agreed standard range of wh/km - wh/mile for large urethane, rubber wheels, and bergs - small pneumies?
I was thinking the same. Maybe I’ll do some testing to confirm behavior / figure out desired behavior, and make a feature request.
Not really. Best way would be to ask people with setups similar to whatever you have in mind. Although some general rules that seem to hold are:
- pneumatics cut range in half compared to a urethane setup
- rubber wheels (soft, airless kind) cut range by 25% compared to urethane.
- double motor vs single motor setups will cut range by 33%. For 4WD I would assume another 33% decrease.
So like, in the worst case, a board that gets 20km range on pneumies with 4WD would get 90km of range if it was a single drive urethane board 
4 Likes
Thanks!! Then I will @Athrx I think he has dual motors and bergs on M1 drives. Is that right? What consumption do you have?
1 Like
Lmao, to go for 90km I would have to add a chair, I just did a 12km high speed run and I wanted to cut my feet out of pain 
I’m asking this as I’m about to switch from rubber wheels to bergs and just want to have an idea on the range.
2 Likes
Just tested this on the bench with FW 5.2 to be sure, and I am correct – setting a really large positive ramping time will cause your brakes to lag significantly.
Those messages are definitely misleading. Maybe this was never the intention, and a legitimate bug? 
2 Likes