They updated it. Now it has standard 63mm mounting holes
1 Like
That’s good news.
What about the phase wire routing? It’s still like before?
Yeah, that is the same I believe.
1 Like
did you get them sensored?
APS sell them with hall sensors as well, but without temp sensor. As minimum that’s how they came last time.
I can confirm, after I had a long discussion with them. Also the cable routing it’s on it’s way to improve. We will also find a solution for the nipple. At least for our custom version.
The 6396 has about 500W more than the TB6380, thats it. On dual drive it’s still 1KW difference.
The lack of a temp sensor in the APS is kind of a deal breaker for me…
We will try do improve the 6396 further. So far I think the a proper designed 63100ish motor is still the best way to go.
1 Like
Yes I got the sensored version. It does lack temp sensors though, which is kinda annoying. The motors does actually get hotter than any 63xx motors that I’ve used. I usually run them at 100 motor amps to save some power and even then they tend to pick up a lot of heat. Previously I used the APS 8085 aswell and those gets really hot, burned through the phase wire insulation and shorted one of the motors.
1 Like
@Chricious I hope you understood that the Watt rating is relative and doesn’t tell if a motor is really „stronger“ than an other one.
It’s a bit like C-rating on lipos. Just depends on which amps and voltage the factory advertised there motor.
2 Likes
I agree. But when you compare the size of the motors, it looks plausible that it has those 500W more. We would need to test it though under same conditions.
Without to measure I would say 6380/84 than about 50-52mm. That tops out in max 5mm more stator length.
So yap a side by side real life comparison would be great.
2 Likes