I would beter optimize the deck’s weight.
Currently my idea is creating a plywood frame that work only as thickness riser and frame for the fiberglass to atttach to. And it’s litterly gonna be a ‘frame’, coz more than the half of the material would be removed from it. Why I want to increase thickness, you may ask. Well, according to the theory of strength of materials, curvature is counter-proportianal to the inertia momentum, which for the rectangular rod is proportional to the thickness qubed. Double the thickness and curvature drops 8 times… This property gives me an abillity to use just a few layers of fiberglass over the frame, so deck literraly can weight 2 pounds.
While I was designing deck’s shape, I’ve realized that my board is almost a replica of the Arc Aileron v2.0. Same weight, same motor size, same phylosophy, actually. So, I’ve decided, that I want to name it like the part of the wing, bc technology of making the deck is almost the same as planes’ fuselage. And… Bingo!
The Wingtip
Not only it is as small as the wingtip, but also it is going to be painted in black with bright orange details like the wingtips painted in bright colors:
The theory is right.
Then again plywood is not light. For better utilization of thickness use foam.
Either way don’t forget about localized stresses/buckling with too thin layer.
Just to be pedantic, that’s a picture of a split scimitar winglet on a 737. Not a normal wingtip
Coincidentally winglet is a great choice for this project as winglets like the one in the photo are predominantly used by short haul airliners as they improve climb performance at the expense of induced drag. This trade off is only worth it for the really short routes. And that’s why larger airliners use raked wingtips.
Been busy this week, so wanna share some thoughts.
Currently watching videos about stm32 programming, bc I wanna move further then good old avr thingies. So yeah, the brains and remote of the wingtip will be stm32-based. The data transmission will be organized on the HC-12 modules, that work flawlessly for me for a long time with no issues.
The antispark and receiver are going to be on the same PCB, which connects directly to the rear of the VESC. This design leads to a good space-management, very clean look and the wires floating around minimized.