I got all the middle parts reprinted, so that it fits better
magical change of the RE44 from blue to black
my design is overcomplicated
idk if you’ve seen last video by Martin on wintergatan channel - I feel somewhat similar way. I prioritized looks (re44) before functionality. If I did this again (which I might do, something similar), I’d do it a bit differently, full bent aluminium, minimum of complexity. something like the cybertruck
I have a question that i was wondering regarding ur build so ik ur using the huge custom metal sheet to hold the pack and pretty much everything but how will all that weight affect the ends of the deck where ur trucks are mounted? I dont think itd be a bad idea to maybe fiberglass the deck top and bottom to add extra strength to it to counter the weight and pressure from the massive pack underneath it. @michondr
week 8 of semester (out of 13)
finally got some time. my depression from not having this finished is going throught the roof. my trampa has problems with battery and one sprocket, so I guess my stress anxiety is going to rise and I’ll be forced to make something work, so I might aswell pour the time to the painkiller
I also had to file down the 3dprint, that took some time. I need to source longer bolts, I’m short on M6x100, so I’ll try to get some nice torx M6x110.
I need to install battery stops, propper mount motor cables (filed and sanded holes) with MT60, heatshrink through the hole, chisel routes for the cable to underside of the deck, attach cables, solder jacks.
then the rest of electrical - flexibms (need to chain power from somewhere, forgot one cable from battery), metrpro can, remote, davega (shit now I realised I need to route the cable ), charging ports, power switch
then all the software, calibration and tweaking, making the CAN work, bla bla bla
probably will do the LEDS later, same as the USB-C for the helmet camera&lights
good question - thought of that, the enclosure rides directly on the trucks and the deck is only for the lateral force
what my brain thinks is that because the enclosure is strongly bolted to the deck, it might be more in tension and the deck in compression. naturally there will be some bending becuse as a rider I stand between two fixed axiles, and some movement might occur. but nonetheless the whole build will be a different universe of flexi comapred to my boosted or trampa.
individual suspension would be very nice with this much momentum on road.
you can run calculations for this? I’d guess that’s possible, but I’ve never seen anybody do that
guys what kind of duo are you? I like you
I’m quite optimistic when the two parts will be one rigid body. the alu alone would be bad, it seems to give after some time under load. I had it laying on the bench for a few weeks with the battery in, and it seems to have permanenetly flexed a bit.
you’re right, that very optimistic. we’ll see how rigit it will actually be. I’ll be doing some jump tests without and with the battery, with all bolted together, to see if it flexes, and if so, by how much. better to test it in a controlled environment than experience it on road
Dude this build is getting more and more scary for each time you post it, just the size of that enclosure and your ground clearance, I would stick to 9" tires minimum, one pot hole and you will have 10s28p suddenly .
Yea i think some wide offset 8 to 9" would really do this build some justice especially since u have over 6kw using 8 or 9" tires not gonna put any damper on ur mega range.
I’m on the same side, I’ll be definitelly switching to 8" after a first ride, but larger wheels are not easy atm, as the 3ds rims I have top at 8". I’d have to get bigger ones
If the goal is to make the structure really stiff in bending, standoffs won’t work because they have high compressive stiffness only, and the connection between the deck and aluminum needs high shear stiffness.
A continuous sheet of material connecting the upper and lower pieces would suffice, or a truss type structure with lots of diagonal rods.
With @michondr we agreed to put forward some colorful pictures of the dynamics of this one, especially after my remark several posts up.
The first thing to consider with dynamics is (well) the dynamic properties, i.e. natural modes and frequencies. So after approximate modeling of this scary tray and putting in 23kg of batteries these are the results:
We’re getting two distinct modes of the tray below the actual deck (the deck is around 90Hz), what it means that with bumps in the road the tray will get excited by itself. Not healthy.
Normally you’ll want the whole structure moving together so no relative motion will happen. I would consider tying the two parts together, standoffs might help, solid walls are better.