-
Yes. All of those are possible.
-
2Q 2024. Maybe earlier depending on a few factors
2 Likes
Made great progress with the firmware support for momentary pushbutton and auto-shutdown! It works with simple benchtop testing. Just gotta make sure it remains stable throughout stressful load conditions.
6 Likes
Benchtop results show stable operation of the momentary on/off function.
All looks good with the v4. All the new features work and I canāt wait to get this out to market.
Alsoā¦there will be a special enclosed version of it available suited for rugged conditions. Thatās all Iām spoiling for now
9 Likes
Both lfocV4 and tronic 32s? Or just tronic 32s and lfocV4 would be sooner?
Thanks
LFOC v4 expected to be sooner
3 Likes
I would guess this doesnāt mean the V3 LFOC could get the momentary switch. Otherwise you would have said but just checking.
1 Like
Correct. The v3 can not do momentary switch support
Hey Shaman, in the new Tronic 250R 32s, would the lights control be in a separate PCB, kind of stack or would be in the same?
We are eager to know how is it going 
Thanks
Light control is part of the main PCB. Iāll provide progress updates as they come
3 Likes
Very exciting to have a 32s with regen ESC
I guess you are very busy, but please donāt forget us.
Thanks
3 Likes
Testing of the v4 is still in progress. Looks like the added current filters do more harm than good for balance applications. Also I got to see some comments from Ben on how the current filters really only benefit the hardware that use in-line current sensing. So yeah kind of useless for the v4. Easy enough to remove them and carry on.
4 Likes
Doing a limited sale for the LFOC v3.1.1 units. PM if interested
3 Likes
The v4 is doing great and breaking some records in some OW circuits. Iāve put it in my Surron to blast it with 250A motor and 80A battery. No issues at all and stay plenty cool.
Will be placing it in a formal enclosure this week to make sure the enclosure is good to go.
9 Likes
How is it on the throttle compared to the stock surron? I would like to use a vesc based controller for my sonās dirt bike but have seen some reports of them having sluggish acceleration compared to something like votol. I always assume it was the user not setting the throttle response or some other settings correctly, but was hesitant to go vesc for that use.
Acceleration depends on amount of motor phase amps being delivered. No idea how much the specific votol controller you mentioned is delivering vs the particular vesc controller you are referring to.
250A phase on an otherwise stock Surron isnāt particularly impressive. Not doing wheelies or anything like that. Itās more of a stress test for the controller
1 Like
I wanna buy two and use them for my gokart that Iām modifying to run on two super flux one wheel motors lol
Would do well as a stress test that wonāt kill the user if it fails
3 Likes
Edit deleted the votol info, seems wrong to post about another product in your product thread.
1 Like
No worries. Itās a common question to bring up about how one controller does vs another. Then that leads to the explanation of phase amps being directly related to torque and so on.
I do understand the relationship between phase amps and torque, the question I had was due to some smaller pit bike builds using vesc and running 70ish battery amps and 100ish motor amps, the same amp settings on vesc vs votol or fardriver, the rider felt it lacked the punch on vesc, now should 100 phase amps feel like 100phase amps no matter which unit is used? The only larger dirt bike builds I could find were using much larger controllers with around 800 phase amps so those builds donāt really help.
1 Like
Your controller is also like 1/4 the size of the votol so that would be ideal as well
1 Like