Thats ok dude you’ll probably never know the difference because you don’t ride enough to find out.
For the people it matters to you don’t even need to know all the manufacturing differences, you can feel it straight away on the first ride and after your friends have gone through 3 sets of flipsky while you’re still on the same set of Radium/Reachers.
heeee diiiiiiid get the reachers to where they are today
they were garbage for like
V1 and V2
Radium did like all the R&D
(also just cause it’s made in china, through a conpany that has all the tooling and machining experience…
dun mean it’s bad. reacher motors would be prohibitively expensive to make and buy if they were made anywhere else
And is that the reason why they outperform the fuck out of flipsky motors in tests? I wonder why people building high performance race boards all agree that reacher motors are a significant step up above flipskys?
Maybe it’s the quality battle hardening, can balance/harmonics, or the proper ventillation across the entire motor?
Or is it that maybe a singular dumbfuck on the forum knows better than every single person with more than two neurons cosplaying as a brain.
The 63100’s can’t handle high current applications like the reachers can. There’s multiple people here who have shattered magnets in their 63100’s or managed to heatsoak them so badly the magnets become detached entirely, not to mention the absolute dogshit harmonics of that long ass can which is too poorly supported. They literally output worse peak power than a set of 6485’s.
I don’t see how you citing a single guy claiming his handle just fine, without any mention of how much current he’s pushing through them shows jack shit. For all you know he could be babying the things running less than 80 amps across the phases.
So again. Shut the fuck up, you clearly don’t build performance boards worth a damn.
Using a quad NMB bearing to handle can resonance and better support loading at high rpm’s
Integrating an impeller fan into the end of the can to draw air through the entire motor through intakes on the mount face side
Better battle hardening and magnet adherence to handle abuse
Countless different revisions of specific magnet configuration/materials to better handle high current saturation and the consequent temperatures
Repositioned and redesigned hall sensors to better handle abuse
Thicker can material, to again better handle the resonances and overall abuse that these motors are capable of
But somehow, all of that isn’t “real engineering” because they’re not using some novel new configuration that is relatively recent and doesn’t have a significant market share, likely raising cost and making finding the required manufacturing lines more difficult to acquire?
As an actual working mechanical engineer - enlighten me - what the fuck engineering have you done?
Congrats, you can modify a honda civic to do an 8 second quarter mile, it doesn’t mean the stock civic is any better. As stock, flipsky motors are shit. And replacing the bearings doesn’t change the quantity of bearings or their positioning, nor does it change the rigidity/precision of the can/shaft assembly.
Gee, it’s almost like there’s more than only thermals, things like can vibration, resonance, and harmonics can result in shattering or dislodging magnets.
You can literally go contact reacher right now and ask them how many different revisions they’ve had of their motors, or ask them for any variety of magnet compositions. Off the top of my head, they’re currently on the V6 of their motors, and within that there’s been a MINIMUM of three different magnet specifications i know of, and i have owned multiple - the motors are significantly better today than they were a few years back.
And? Hall sensors are sufficient.
So again, i’m gonna ask. What the fuck engineering have you done?
You and the cactus you fuck yourself with don’t comprise a team. Less than a week ago you were cluelessly asking about flipsky motors. You haven’t done a design review for jack shit besides the dildo you’re currently choking down.