Hi @yongitech,
In that case please change your thread title. Because you actually violate a TM to advertise your product.
The TM policies can be found here: https://vesc-project.com/trademark_policies
As a good example: Lacroix created the brand Stormcore for their VESC compatible derivates.
Their thread title is called LACROIX Stormcore ESC and iOS app info
They do not use the VESC brand in trade at all. They point out the compatibility but the identity of the product differs vastly from the VESC TM. This is how things should be. Enertion has done the same with the FOCBOX brand. Both companies created their own brands for marketing purpose.
The VESC Project offers source code and schematics, but it can not offer brand identity. Open Source is about sharing the knowledgable and allow collaboration, it is not necessarily about sharing identity, which is from a legal point of view simply not possible anyway. In order to allow others to point out compatibility with software, the TM policies have a section, describing how to make use of the brand VESC to point out such compatibilities. It is totally fine to point out such compatibilities! But you need to stick to the TM policies.
Coming back to a positive example again, Lacroix for example states::
The firmware of the Stormcore is VESC based and is compatible with all third-party apps supporting the latest firmware, but we recommend using only the Stormcore app and the official VESC software hosted at https://www.vesc-project.com/
Please note that the VESC Brand is WIPO registered, amongst other countries the application is including China and HK.