so, i have lil focers v3.0 just learning about the difference on the newer v3.1
better thermals making me jealous.
but I still will push forward slowling figuring out this current setup.
Dern, I procrastinated, and now i got myself stuck for testing day tomorrow.
put wrong fw on one of the lil focers (hw3.1 vs hw3.0 ) and I donât have the version that was on it.
wanting 5.02 for hw3.0 if anyone has it.
and iâm confused whatâs in the archive:
vesc fw archive has:
Little_FOCer: 5.03
Little_FOCer_V3: 6.00, 6.02
Little_FOCer_V3_1: 6.00, 6.02
tried the 5.03 from there but it has a hw limit of 175 ABS Current. so thatâs not the one i was running, and maybe itâs for earlier fw versions?
anyhow pinged shaman. but stuck at the moment.
They took away all the no limit firmwares in the archieve that might be why.
Thereâs a no limit 5.03 for Little_FOCer. iâm just unsure if thatâs for hw3.0 or something earllier.
You need to run the proper firmware version for the proper hardware version. Donât run the v1 firmware on the v3 hardware. It wonât work at all
yeah thatâs why i stopped. i assumed the 5.03 firmware in the archive for âLittle_FOCerâ was not v3 firmware. sounds like thatâs for v1.
Ok,
Shaman confirms no 5.02 available for LittleFocer.
- I got fresh 5.03fw for hw3.0 installed.
- updated zero vector frequency ( that is âswitching frequencyâ right? ). from 20khz to 30khz
- redetected motors. [ using vesc_tool 6.03, foc detect tab, default currents ]
- cut motor shafts, brought pinions in, narrowed rear slightly.
- rerouted motor wires so they arenât dangerously near the spinning motors.
hopefully get some testing in wed night.
not much changed in the detection results. However the resistance for both motors came down from 23mΩ to 15mΩ ish on both motors. seems weird.
I didnât figure out much about switching frequency / zero conf frequency. so Iâm trusting the guidance from @shaman here. I hope to understand better. My cursory understanding⊠is the switches will switch 50% more⊠so more heat possible. Second I postulate that should give better resolution generating the higher frequency wave forms needed at higher erpms. but⊠thatâs almost pulled out of my butt. xD. links to good expalanations appreciated.
so⊠no load speed of 57mph is quite a bit more than the 49 top i was expecting.
@DEEIF are you sure these are the 151kv? and not the 173kv? @Skyart any way to tell?
yes tito.
The teachers say their kv on the face that you bolt on
hmm. have to wait till next time i pull it apart. they hvae 40mm to 30mm adapter plates covering that spot.
So. the No load flutter appears to be gone. [Edit. it is not] Although itâs kinda scary to test running up past 85% dutycycle on âthe benchâ xD so much screaming gear noise.
so is bumping to 30khz related to the no load flutter seeming to go away?
Did you get 6.02 fw on there?
No, Iâm sticking with 5.03 for robogotchi compatibility for now.
Its possible increasing you HZ helped with the flutter. Your MCU takes more current samples now so its able to more accurately run your motors
maybe iâll try switching it back to see if it comes back.
Any downsides to increasing the HZ?
fet efficiency goes down, should drop your motor amps and more heat
wednesday sesh dinât happen.
Todayâs i2s session got rained out.
finally dried up a bit i took it for some street riding.
motors got hot quick. idk for sure if thatâs just street riding. longer periods at higher speeds (30 - 37mph, 48 -59kph) but probably the 50% increase in zero vector frequency.
but, also the gearing.
donât have good telemetry as robogotchi somehow doesnât like the new fw even though itâs 5.03 still.
always a new problem. xD