VESC-Tool 2.04: FW 5 >> A BIG STEP FORWARD

So then the answer to “why” is that Benjamin doesn’t want to work on firmware anymore for a while, and that version 4 was killing 75/300 VESCs the whole time version 5 wasn’t released.

Well maybe if @Trampa led with that, then it all would make sense. But the omissions and deflections make them seem really shady when there is an actual serious reason.

Every day I think more and more we should just ignore everything @Trampa says and only listen to @Deodand, @Pimousse, @Blasto et cetera. (Vedder too, but he refuses to use this forum and his forum is on ancient software that is super annoying to use)

1 Like

Again, that is your interpretation.
You can’t say “the answer is”.
You don’t know.

As the knight of accuracy (direct drive vs. gear drive, mah vs. mAh…) why not apply the same rigour to your comments ? :slightly_smiling_face:

1 Like

I literally just read that.

So, stop barking please. Because yes, that does appear to be the answer to the “why” question. The question Trampa vehemently refused to answer.

I’m definitely no knight. I just use esk8 for transportation – partially because it’s fun – and partially because it’s the responsible thing to do regarding climate change. If that means people like you feel the need to attack me, then that says a lot about you.

So again, stop barking please, because that’s not my interpretation, it’s what Vedder actually said. I calmly asked “why” a long time ago – and just because some corporation decides to deflect and try to turn this into a PR circus doesn’t give you a license to be a dick.

You should try to work together instead of against people who are actually on the same team as you.

3 Likes

4 Likes

We actually saged a temperature monitored 12s3P Sony VTC6 pack to see if we can overheat it. We couldn’t.
The only option I see is a list of all known cells, so that you can describe your pack in the Wizard, selecting the configuration and cell type. I have a set of data from a lot of known cells to hand. But surely it would need to be updated.

1 Like

Max/average current and speed are not in the app. What a bummer, I know

You can enable rt data and check it on your laptop, but who has time for that

1 Like

That’s disappointing. One of the reasons METR. Is good is because his addresses an ecosystem that Ben has ignored and offers things the VESC Tool doesn’t. I see no reason why everything centered around the VESC should be open sourced if it’s not the VESC itself. @rpasichnyk has put in a lot of time and effort into METR.

6 Likes

TLDR…
who has put this on their Unity and did it work and make you a happier person?
Anyone had success updating firmware just via the app?

1 Like

** off topic **
I use to run a dual boot system for years. Redhat Linux and Windows. Loved it.

2 Likes

@drone001 may you some day join us miscreants in derail jail

also off topic, i swore off windows some twenty years ago, and live in a windows-free household. now that my own kids are asking for a windows system to play games on, it is rekindling my frustrations from years past

4 Likes

Also derailing:

If they really need a game that doesn’t work fine with Steam’s Proton or PlayOnLinux, you could add another GPU to your system, and pass it through to a virtual machine. If they really need to play something with a nasty DRM like Valorant, then make them save up money for their own computer and separate home network, like my brother has done :laughing:

4 Likes

Brian, I had criticisms and concerns so I literally got on a 15 hour train, last minute, to go have a discussion with Ben and Jeff about said concerns. And imagine that, I came out with lot more understanding and perspective on what Ben is facing and have committed further to contributions on the VESC-Project.

If you are unhappy with how this open source project is developing, then I suggest you contribute rather than loudly complain as a user. I’ve made this suggestion before and you told me you were too busy. Your call.

13 Likes

I think he has helped in many ways, but he also damages the project sometimes (in my opinion) with his over-aggressive stances and forcing everything into black-and-white. Complaints are actually an important part of development, but yes at times it can be frustrating. My number one ask would be just a more polite tone, but I am not sure that is something we will get.

20 Likes

I don’t always love how Frank handles everything here, but he deserves better than that. Please chill with the inflammatory rhetoric.

15 Likes

Updating via the PC tool took about 10 seconds and was fairly easy to reconfigure. I lost my temp sensor readings but @Deodand says that FW 5.2 should fix this thankfully.

I miss the push time to power down parameter in the switch settings but that’s very minor and I hope they add it to the VESC tool.

Motor detection seemed much more “thorough” or “comprehensive” compared to FW 23.46. I don’t really know how to describe it but it was noticible. I have not ridden on FW5.x because I reverted back.

1 Like

Can you still use the unity push to start functionality with the vesc tool?

I don’t think so but I don’t have my desktop set up right now so I can’t check immediately. I don’t remember seeing any parameter besides the power off timeout setting.

EDIT: You can

Push to start is just always enabled.

1 Like

Me, yes, and yes.

6 Likes

Really good to see you guys have done testing with this and have confirmed that the setting on its own will not cause any issues

4 Likes