Actually there are a lot of typos and mistakes on the Trampa site. I often come across products on the site that have copied and pasted descriptions from other products. It certainly would be good for them to have someone take a proofread and polish pass on it all. A good idea might be to add a feature that lets viewers flag some content as needing review. They could even make it only a feature that logged in users can see.
Why not use the same method that every other vendor site uses? It works extremely well.
Besides, that you describe has already been invented, itâs called MediaWiki.
if they did that, the entire website would be flagged
on a slight tangent, fix your goddam website
Yes, he definitely said it is a DRV based system IMHO.
Except intentionally made it vague and unclear.
The Vesc 6 schematics are published since yearsâŚ
When someone asks if this is a DRV based design, only Trampa chooses to respond with a paragraph of marketing copy, never answering the question, and then complain the answer is available to those that dig deep, instead of simply typing âyesâ or ânoâ the first time, like a considerate person.
Why are you terrified of this question? Fake drvs doing you dirty?
and your website hasnât changed in years
I had to use a pic since discorse dosnt like trampas rather liberal use of spaces
It actually did change a little bit maybe ~1 year ago. The improvement was not noticeable.
you know whatâs noticeable?
THESE TRAMPA EXCLUSIVE BUS GRADE SILICONE ULTRA FLEXIBLE SILICONE WIRE
AND THESE WONDERFUL âMARINE GRADEâ SCREWS
I LOVE NOT GETTING THEM WHEN I ORDER MY VAPORWARE TRAMPA BMS
Any pictures of the PCB? Which mosfets does this use?
bet your answer will be about using the best components that give the best reliability and power compared to other escs on the market and that itâs still the only official vesc esc trademarked
something something blah blah, no pictures because itâs not in production yet
canât show u those vapour drv chips, good luck getting that from trampa
So anyone can provide the pic of the pcb of this new trampa esc?
I donât think that Mouser sold or sells fake DRVs.
They have never been a problem in the VESC 6 design. Failure rate of the VESC 6 is extremly low.
The DRV 8301 is pretty good at protecting the power stage and itself. Designs with individual gate drivers are actually more prone to damages related to current or voltage spikes.
for those of us who donât have any ee background, what does this illustrate? is frank incorrect?
It depends a bit on a combination of switching frequency, whether âsample in v0v7â is on and if running foc vs bldc. Vedder had a video where he ran a motor at 150k erpms on foc, but the risk at those high rpms is that at some point the processor wont be able to keep up and best case you will get a fault.
how high can you go before things get substantially more risky? (I understand this is not a precise objective question) Essentially, at what level should i start to feel uncomfortable?