Of course.
A 5P pack of 15A cells would be rated at 75A.
âUnder-ratedâ as measured how? Samsung rates them exactly where they want them to be rated for the claimed cycle life and desired performance. 30Qâs can, of course, be used at above their rating. This is true of any cell. But thatâs a capability, not a rating or indication of the cell being under-rated.
At 15A continuous a 30Q in free air will reach almost 70°C. Inside a wrapped-up pack, with hot cells next to it, the cells will easily exceed their 75°C max temp rating. At 16A (80A rating / 5) you are toasting those cells. That increases the risks of using those cells and shortens their life.
You might be thinking âbut no one does that, no one uses a cell continuously until it gets that hotâ. But thatâs what a rating is for, what it tells you. It says how hard you can run the cells without that kind of overheating (if in open air).
If a company rates the pack it doesnât matter whether we will use the pack that way or not. Whatâs important is the legitimacy of the rating.
The 30Q is a good cell and can be used hard. But at above 12A or so the voltage sag starts becoming disproportionately large and performance really starts to suffer when compared to true âpowerâ cells like the P26A, VTC5A or VTC5D, etc. This is true for pulsed or continuous use.
Put together the performance hit at higher current levels and the heating the cells see in a pack and, personally, I am troubled by a pack rating that is above the rating given by the manufacturer for the cells.
I do understand the extraordinary pressure these companies feel to rate their packs as high as possible though. The competition is insane. Thatâs the reason, certainly, for high ratings but it can never be accepted as a valid excuse.
75A also seems very optimistic for the gauge of wire selected for the main leads. The insulation might not melt at 75A but the power losses will not be small.
A final concern for the pack assemblerâŚsetting a pack rating that results in being over the manufacturerâs rating for each cell opens up the pack assemblers to some serious legal liability if there is an accident. This isnât an issue for a company in China (no one can touch them) but would be something avoided by any company in the EU or US. Any accident with the pack and the courts would slam them once the high rating was mentioned.
I donât say any of this to put down this pack or dissuade anyone from buying the pack. Iâve already told two people about it who might be interested. What the manufacturer rates the pack is a number, not affecting the quality of the pack assembly or its performance.
But we have to be careful about what we call a âratingâ, the differences between a rating and just a capability, and how we can safely use a pack and have great performance with long cell life.