Did you not strongly advocate for folks to run dual receivers instead of a canbus cable for a hot minute? I seem to recall this being a hill you were ready to die on.
Iām just pointing out that if weāre talking about ādangerous and stupidā advice; dual receivers is up there with suggesting folks ditch helmets, and nowhere on the same level as misunderstanding the meaning of nominal.
Now youāre at least talking about machines instead of people, just the wrong topic. But youāre getting closer to becoming relevant to the discussion above. Keep going buddy!ā
I find it ironic how that particular phrase is only said to people who are not someoneās buddy, by people who are clearly still going, unwarranted.
For more fun facts like that, follow me on nothing, I donāt have any accounts on platforms that work like that, and I donāt want anyone following me.
So weāre clear, I take issue with toxic shitty statements like this:
For context this is a hobbyist (@b264 ) speaking to an engineer (educated guess @Razillian ) and trying to claim they donāt understand a simple topic.
Thereās zero reason for @b264 to be rude about this, especially when he was dead wrong anyway.
Yep, and then once it was discovered that we both agree that the nominal value is just a name, and you linked an article agreeing, then, as usual, you delve into attacking a personās reputation, because itās just what you do.