Noticed quicker acceleration while holding water bottle?

did someone do a battery in a backpack awhile back?
since im here drinking tequila here is the query/result i got:

  1. Weight distribution and traction:
    You’re right that placing the battery on the rider alone would increase the weight on the drive wheel, which can potentially increase traction. This is especially true if the front foot is lifted during launch, as you mentioned.

  2. Center of mass:
    Placing the battery on the rider would raise the overall center of mass of the rider-vehicle system. This can have both positive and negative effects:
    a. It could provide more leverage for the rider to apply force to the drive wheel.
    b. However, it might also make the system less stable, especially during turns or at higher speeds.

  3. Lean angle and contact patch:
    The higher center of mass would affect the lean angle required to maintain balance, especially during turns. This could potentially reduce the contact patch of the tire in some situations, which might counteract some of the traction gains.

  4. Rider comfort and control:
    Having the battery on the rider might affect their comfort and ability to control the vehicle, especially if it’s a significant weight.

  5. Vehicle design considerations:
    Placing the battery on the board allows for better integration with the vehicle’s systems and potentially better protection for the battery.

  6. Dynamic weight transfer:
    During acceleration, weight naturally transfers to the rear wheel, which is usually the drive wheel. This happens regardless of battery placement, but the effect might be more pronounced with a rider-mounted battery.

In conclusion, while your statement about increased traction is theoretically correct in a static situation, the real-world implications are more complex. The overall performance, stability, and safety of the vehicle depend on a balance of these factors, which is why most electric skateboards and similar vehicles have the battery integrated into the board itself.

Dynamic Load Transfer:
During acceleration, there's a rearward weight shift due to inertia. This phenomenon, known as load transfer, is described by the equation:

ΔWr = (m * a * h) / L

Where:
ΔWr = change in rear axle load
m = total mass
a = acceleration
h = height of center of gravity (CG)
L = wheelbase

With the battery on the rider, ‘h’ increases, potentially amplifying this effect.

Rotational Inertia:
The moment of inertia (I) of the system changes with battery placement. For a rider, we can approximate using the parallel axis theorem:

I = Icm + md²

Where Icm is the moment of inertia about the center of mass, m is the mass, and d is the distance from the axis of rotation. This affects the system’s resistance to angular acceleration.

Tire Deformation and Contact Patch:
Tire behavior follows the Pacejka "Magic Formula":

Fy = D * sin(C * arctan(B * α - E * (B * α - arctan(B * α))))

Where Fy is the lateral force, and α is the slip angle. Coefficients B, C, D, and E depend on tire properties and normal force, which changes with weight distribution.

Gyroscopic Effects:
The precession torque (τ) on a spinning wheel is given by:

τ = I * ω * Ω

Where I is the wheel’s moment of inertia, ω is its angular velocity, and Ω is the angular velocity of the lean. This effect becomes more pronounced at higher speeds and can influence stability.

Control Theory Perspective:
The system can be modeled as an inverted pendulum, with the state-space representation:

[θ’‘] = [0 1][θ] + [0][u]
[θ’ ] = [g/l 0][θ’] + [1/ml²]

Where θ is the angle from vertical, l is the pendulum length, and u is the input torque. Battery placement affects ‘l’ and ‘m’, changing the system’s natural frequency and damping ratio.

Aerodynamics:
The drag force is given by:

Fd = (1/2) * ρ * v² * Cd * A

Where ρ is air density, v is velocity, Cd is the drag coefficient, and A is the frontal area. Battery placement affects the rider’s posture and thus A and Cd.

Material Stress:
If the battery were integrated into a wearable harness, we'd need to consider the stress (σ) on the harness material:

σ = F / A

Where F is the force applied and A is the cross-sectional area of the material.

Electrical Considerations:
Wire length from battery to motor would increase, leading to greater resistance (R) and power loss (P):

P = I²R

Where I is current and R is resistance.

Thermodynamics:
Heat dissipation from the battery becomes more critical when worn by the rider. The heat transfer rate (Q) is given by:

Q = h * A * ΔT

Where h is the heat transfer coefficient, A is the surface area, and ΔT is the temperature difference.

i think the board will likely be more tame with the battery directly attached

8 Likes

A human’s center of mass (who isn’t holding a battery in their outstretched hand) is usually inside their torso just above their hips.

IMG_0768

You can calculate the lean angle from vertical required between the rear foot and rider’s center of mass (front foot lifted) by taking the arctangent of the desired acceleration in g’s. For example the arctan of 1g is 45 degrees.

This means when not holding a battery there needs to be an angle of 45 degrees from vertical between the rear foot and the rider’s hips when accelerating at average 1g to avoid being “bucked off” the rear of the board (assumes front foot lifted).

If the rider is holding the battery forward, this moves the rider + battery’s center of mass forward so that it is no longer above the riders hips but rather some distance forward. Consequently when holding the battery forward, a 1g average, 45 degree lean angle can be achieved while the angle to the rider’s hips from the rear foot is less than 45 degrees from vertical.

In other words, holding the battery forward reduces the rider’s required forward lean angle to achieve a given acceleration, such as 1g average, because the angle to the center of mass of the rider + battery can be 45 degrees while the angle to the rider’s hips from their rear foot can be less than 45 degrees.

In summary, holding the battery forward improves traction while simultaneously reducing the required lean angle of the rider.

Noticed quicker acceleration with a skateboard in the frunk?

5 Likes

The front half of the car IS the water bottle.

lies

the caf squats when it launches because the torque applied to the rear wheels causes the front of the car to lift, wasting energy and power going into the ground, meaning less speed.

you need to fill the front of the car with water bottles to counteract this torque and maintain peak efficiency in power delivery, reducing your acceleration time

He’s so back

2 Likes

Do you ever talk about this stuff with your uber passengers

1 Like

Sometimes I mention saving $150/mo on brake pads because a Tesla slowing down is “like a magnet falling through a copper tube….”

IMG_1370

2 Likes

if you have to spend $150/mo on brake pads, you have bigger issues

how often you think they need to be replaced

3 Likes

About every 40,000 miles and I Uber about 10,000 miles per month. $600 for brake job every 4 months. Also saving $150/mo in oil changes and $900/mo on gas. That’s about $1200 total savings per month in operating costs vs ICE.

1 Like

i had alot of fun doing uber, the flexibility is great, and i got to read alot during downtime. as far as the main battery bank goes they arent rebuildable like the prius? or will you trade it in when it gets to a certain point. does it even give you that metric?

We’ll see but putting the operating savings toward payments pays off $17k in 14 months.

Economy is so bad professors have to do Uber? =/

2 Likes

I put my uber passengers up front for quicker acceleration

Safer for me too

2 Likes

If they fit, you could put them in the frunk aka froot aka fartment.

2 Likes

I call the place I sit the fartment

Sometimes I forget where that fart went

1 Like

Why wouldn’t I make extra $ in my free time between photoshoots?

1 Like

you must either bet lying or not doing a lot of photoshopts

if you claim 10k miles a month, that’s about 330 miles a day, and at an average speed of 35mph, that takes 9.4 hours, adding an hour of supercharging to be able to achieve 330 miles a day,

that’s over 10 hours of driving a day
and that’s assuming you’re driving 365 days a year*

allllso, saving $900 every 10,000 miles is very
very generous.
let’s assume be funny $4.50 a gallon.
and let’s assume a toyota camry gets about 35mpg, which is also being funny.

that’s $1285 per 10,000 miles.

let’s assume, averaging about $0.40 per kWh between home charging and supercharging (which is also a very generous assumption btw.)
at an efficiency of 300Wh/mi, that gives you a cost of about

$1200 per 10,000 miles.

soooooooooo you’re in reality saving about $80 in gas :slight_smile:

and don’t forget, what you save in brake pad replacements, you end up paying out towards new tires about every… 15,000 miles? maybe 20,000 miles at best? which on your car is $300 per tire. that means the cost spread out is $600 every 10,000 miles there.

and don’t throw bs about how you drive. you don’t get the performance model to drive like a granny, and we all know it

5 Likes

last car got 25mpg stop and go, and over $5/gal in norcal, 11a to 6p and 8p to 1:30a, 6 days a week unless I have a photoshoot, tesla gets about 10mi/$

I get 35 mpg in my mini van. Gas is sitting just under $3 / gal.

12 miles / $ but I can carry 7 passengers :sunglasses:

2 Likes