So, I am a luddite, and use non smart BMS. I remove the balance cables, and check each group manually, then subtract the number from the previous one. We do this also to check our hookup is right.
My question is, is there any risk to doing this unhooking of the balance connector when battery is charged?
You could just measure the difference between two balance leads to get the voltage of one pgroup. Warning, this does increase the chance of a probe-short
I think that’s just so you don’t accidentally mess up the balance wire order. I don’t think you need to disconnect the b- every time you disconnect the balance wires.
Nor is it important which order you connect the balance wires / b-. The only important thing is that nothing gets connected where it doesn’t belong.
But of course it’s good practice to measure every balance cable on the jst before connecting it into the bms for the first time to make sure they are in the correct order
Of course, the correctness check when first hooking it up, is where I got the idea of how to test balance.
I saw that those values rose step by step, DUH, a little subtraction, and voila, accurate reading of the pgroups.
Even better, a jst passthrough connector, that feeds to a liquid crystal readout of say twenty spaces, for all types. The SMART BMSs are power hogs, somewhat. The bluetooth sucks juice, and can drain your battery faster than you had expected. I would like a box tied to the baseplate that only lights when the sparkless switch is triggered. With 20 spaces for readout. That automatically subtracted the reading from the preceding reading. Thus a zero vampire drain balance readout.
JST 2.0 PH Parts ordered. Male & female 2,6, and 11pin.
I already have 2 2.54mm 6 pin female
I have two of those 7cell lcd capacity checkers. If i get an 11pin header for my 10s bms connector, I should be able to feed cells 1 to 5 into one unit and 5 to 10 into a second, I think, and easily be able to scroll through the10 P groups.