VESC-Tool 2.0 and Firmware 4.0 - The beginning of a new era - (SERIOUS)

@Deodand any progress made in getting HFI to the Unity?

2 Likes

Yes, Iā€™ll have something out soon.

13 Likes

Love your work mate! :+1:t3: :+1:t3:

3 Likes

I have also wobble problems at speed and it could be the FW4.0 because I tried everything else to solve it without success. It always happens between 44-46km/h (27.3-28.6mph). Setup: Vesc6, 220kv, 1:6.25 gearing, 9".

I recorded some log files and recognized that the duty cycle seems strange. When the wobble happens the value jumps around. Blue line is speed an pink duty cycle.

Here 2 wobblesā€¦

Here 45.72 km/h and 77.40 % duty cycle

Also 45.72 km/h but 92.80 % duty cycle ???

Thatā€™s close to 95% but there is also the wobble when it is below 85%, very strangeā€¦

19 Likes

What ESC?

Vesc6

3 Likes

I like the song choiceā€¦ Same thing Iā€™m experiencing

10 Likes

Sounds like you hit the max erpm programmed into the tool. I did also notice that Ack firmware is super smooth with that, and the 4.1 is very abrupt when you hit top speed it jerks around a lot.

2 Likes

I think the reason Iā€™m not noticing wobbles ā€” but I notice the very jerky max erpm backoff ā€” is because Iā€™m using single drive.

It looks like when one motor backs off, it speeds up the other motor because of the way the trucks are, which then causes that motor to back off and the other one reengage (because itā€™s now slowed down a tad) causing a feedback loop.

Thatā€™s my hypothesis, anyway.

BTW Iā€™m using Control Mode: Current Hyst Reverse With Brake

6 Likes

One more vote for something ERPM related, since there isnā€™t any tuning of the speed PID for each specific board this looks exactly like and overshoot and over correct while being under dampened

1 Like

Max erpm is default at 80% off 100k. My setup is no capable of 80k, itā€™s below 60k erpmā€¦ 31mph would be about 45k erpm on my setup

4 Likes

Then maybe itā€™s simply a bug? I am also noticing this but itā€™s not wobbling me out like @richā€™s video

2 Likes

Yes. I would say itā€™s non stable

2 Likes

@Trampa Iā€™m a big fan of having specific real world examples of points Iā€™m trying to make. This is one of those very examples.

Do you recall a certain stable/unstable discussion recently and how the lack of a dev/stable cycle can be problematic?

You have multiple users, including @rich (whom Iā€™m particularly fond of thanks to his sweet choice in hubs and also greatly trust his experience/insight), reporting issues.

This is going to happen. Itā€™ll keep happening. Itā€™s part of hardware development.

Which is exactly why it should be happening as an opt-in dev branch so users have visibility & choice.

18 Likes

@Titoxd1000 really set you up for that, didnā€™t he? :laughing:

7 Likes

I am nothing if not a proper opportunist.

10 Likes

This thread is for the unstable trampa branch.

The stable code will be over here

7 Likes

Itā€™s been awhile Brian. But finally, just finally I can agree with you. Letā€™s make out really quickā€¦ :wink:

P.S- Serious tooā€¦ :kiss:

11 Likes

@rich What control mode are you using in that video?

4 Likes

This is my first foray away from the rock-solid @Ackmaniac code, and only for the HFI feature. Which, by the way, is a new ā€œessential featureā€ on any of my skates :sob:

8 Likes