@Deodand any progress made in getting HFI to the Unity?
Yes, Iāll have something out soon.
Love your work mate!
I have also wobble problems at speed and it could be the FW4.0 because I tried everything else to solve it without success. It always happens between 44-46km/h (27.3-28.6mph). Setup: Vesc6, 220kv, 1:6.25 gearing, 9".
I recorded some log files and recognized that the duty cycle seems strange. When the wobble happens the value jumps around. Blue line is speed an pink duty cycle.
Here 2 wobblesā¦
Here 45.72 km/h and 77.40 % duty cycle
Also 45.72 km/h but 92.80 % duty cycle ???
Thatās close to 95% but there is also the wobble when it is below 85%, very strangeā¦
What ESC?
Vesc6
I like the song choiceā¦ Same thing Iām experiencing
Sounds like you hit the max erpm programmed into the tool. I did also notice that Ack firmware is super smooth with that, and the 4.1 is very abrupt when you hit top speed it jerks around a lot.
I think the reason Iām not noticing wobbles ā but I notice the very jerky max erpm backoff ā is because Iām using single drive.
It looks like when one motor backs off, it speeds up the other motor because of the way the trucks are, which then causes that motor to back off and the other one reengage (because itās now slowed down a tad) causing a feedback loop.
Thatās my hypothesis, anyway.
BTW Iām using Control Mode: Current Hyst Reverse With Brake
One more vote for something ERPM related, since there isnāt any tuning of the speed PID for each specific board this looks exactly like and overshoot and over correct while being under dampened
Max erpm is default at 80% off 100k. My setup is no capable of 80k, itās below 60k erpmā¦ 31mph would be about 45k erpm on my setup
Then maybe itās simply a bug? I am also noticing this but itās not wobbling me out like @richās video
Yes. I would say itās non stable
@Trampa Iām a big fan of having specific real world examples of points Iām trying to make. This is one of those very examples.
Do you recall a certain stable/unstable discussion recently and how the lack of a dev/stable cycle can be problematic?
You have multiple users, including @rich (whom Iām particularly fond of thanks to his sweet choice in hubs and also greatly trust his experience/insight), reporting issues.
This is going to happen. Itāll keep happening. Itās part of hardware development.
Which is exactly why it should be happening as an opt-in dev branch so users have visibility & choice.
I am nothing if not a proper opportunist.
This thread is for the unstable trampa branch.
The stable code will be over here
Itās been awhile Brian. But finally, just finally I can agree with you. Letās make out really quickā¦
P.S- Serious tooā¦
This is my first foray away from the rock-solid @Ackmaniac code, and only for the HFI feature. Which, by the way, is a new āessential featureā on any of my skates