Gallium Nitride (GaN) Charger for Esk8

This has always NOT been the major selling point. The point of having Gallium Nitride is so that its efficiency allows for such a charger to be passively cooled.

The other benefits you’re missing out on are its simple switch which switches profiles, allowing it to adjust between 12s/13s/14s; and it can work across 90v - 240v AC, which some cheaper options on aliexpress don’t; lastly, how is extreme endurance not a plus when what we’re doing while riding is essentially extreme sports? I’ve had a fair share amount of my own aliexpress chargers die on me when I fall, which either would ground me from riding for a few weeks, or just plain deny my further participation during a group ride. I think there are some benefits in that list that some people are going to value.

If I spent nearly 12 grand on my own DIY charger, so be it… But I’m willing to bet that this is an issue amongst people who do require quiet fast charging. Maybe the forum’s demographic just doesn’t align with that group of people.

Speaking of target demographic… This charger is mainly for prebuilt riders. There’s a good chance that they have a slower charger, and some with multiple boards in their quiver has differently structured packs in their board, with some 12s, some 13s, and more recently, a lot more 14s around. This could be very useful to THOSE people.

I guess why I came here in the first place mainly has to do with me relating myself to the DIY community a bit more since doing and making DIY esk8s is how I spent most of my esk8 experience…

My original feedback was to design a charger around features, and not mandate a specific type of transistor. To the end user, the specific material inside the transistors literally doesn’t matter. Use the best parts to accomplish the goals.

Now picture marketing this as “a charger” and not “a GaN charger”. How will it fit in the market? It costs too much and doesn’t have enough features. That’s literally it.

5 Likes

Which features would people like? 200 grams charger that’s 3000 watts and can charge 3s-36s with auto-detection that’s the size of a credit card which also literally folds space and time and ships your charged PEV back from the future when you as little as scratch it?

At some point, we’ll have to leave desired features at defeat of physics. Simple as that.

Since people are so persistent, I’ll make a fanned prototype and draw a comparison, and then you’ll most likely pull up the same decision I did…

Who here is actually bothered by fan noise so much that they want to spend 200-300$ on a charger though? I think thats the point. None of the other benfits are THAT much of a leap benfit wise to justify the cost.

I think what most people are expressing they want and what they would pay that money for is the ability to charge a WIDE variety of voltages first. 6s to 20s, next speed to charge, than portability and lastly sound/everything else. Obviously saftey is above all those first but the concensus seems you are working on the opposite side of that spectrum first and forsaking the other things people value more.

Maybe Im wrong ?

4 Likes

image

4 Likes

Yes, gallium nitride’s efficiency is better, but why should anyone care? Congrats, it allows it to be passively cooled. It’s still a more inconvenient form factor, and heavier. And how many people actually care for the difference between passive cooling and a quiet fan? If GAN isn’t your main selling point, why is that what it’s titled? Why are you titling it after that, and not it’s benefits?

Congrats, switching profiles is marginally novel, but the DIY community you’re talking to here is either on 12S, or 18S lol. If they spent money to go higher voltage than 12S, necessitating a higher tier of VESC, chances are they went up to 16 or 18S. Why not just allow for a variable voltage setting instead of presets? That would actually be a novel feature that provides significant benefits, like changing your storage voltage or preserving battery longevity.

Extreme endurance? I don’t see many people complaining that the radium or SKP charger breaks. You’re being told right now by numerous people that the existing feature set does not provide enough value to justify the cost and other downsides.

And if you’re targeting it towards prebuilt riders, for one - this forum is not the greatest representation of that target demographic, and secondly, many prebuilt boards have a limit to the charge rate that they can handle. What exactly, do you think will happen when the BMS on a prebuilt is set up to handle 5A charging and you throw a charger at 10A at it? Or what if the crappy barrel jack can’t support 10A? This would be a very good reason to allow for variable current settings, but it isn’t present.

1 Like

For your first counter - I don’t recall anyone ever struggling with trying to charge their board underwater, or while an earthquake is occuring. People are pretty satisfied with the durability of existing quality chargers as is.

For your second counter - Change the form factor then. You’ve already been told the form factor is inconvenient, change it to utilize a blower fan stacked ontop instead of at the end. And i don’t recall many people here complaining about fan noise of chargers - if anything, i’ve seen far more people (especially on the prebuilt board side) complaining their charger is too hot because it’s passive, and having to put a desk fan near it. Use quality fans, it’s a non-issue.

For your third counter - The user doesnt care if you make money or not. What matters is results.

Fifth counter - That’s unfortunate, but if you can’t figure out a workaround, it’s going to struggle on the market and be considered a downside.

Sixth - Again, unfortunate. You’re limiting the selling points of the product, further reducing the appeal.

2 Likes

giphy (4)

9 Likes

5 Likes

Using the word “retarded” as a pejorative is demeaning to a group of people that we should honestly be nothing but compassionate and kind toward. It’s tasteless to use, and isn’t tolerated here regardless of who you are directing it towards.

Act as you see fit, but you’ll get banned from this forum if you continue talking like that.

11 Likes

This awesome and cheap meanwell beats my GaN charger when comparing volume to watts

Meanwell
220x75x40mm=660,000
310 watts. Adjustable voltage
Like 85$ with shipping

GaN from Alibaba.com
150x35x60=315,000
87.6watts
Not adjustable
Like 30$ with shipping

Rrr I see this isn’t a general topic and don’t mean to step on your toes with developing a new charger. I’m just syched on this meanwell. Not only will they do really high voltage, but adjustable, silent, cheap n powerful.

1 Like

or the ones I’ve been buying from li-tech all these years for that matter. I have zero dead chargers. I blew one up when using a shitty square wave inverter in my car once, but that’s to be expected.

This. You have to be very selective on those, and I’m pretty sure the most any of them can handle is 10A, and they’re the heavier 2.5 x 5.5 type, and it’s only some of them, not all. Definitely not what evolve or whoever is using lol

5 Likes

I got around to checking this today, and mine is roughly 45 decibels from a meter away. Certainly not loud enough that it would cause problems anywhere I need to charge, personally.

2 Likes

The idea of branding with GaN is more to explain how we were able to keep a 600W charger cool enough for silent, passive cooling in such a small volume and limited surface area. It wasn’t just to flex the better semiconductor. As many people in this thread who are far more qualified with electronics have already pointed out, the MOSFETs alone being GaN doesn’t warrant a smaller charger automatically, but “GaN” is indeed what people have associated portable chargers with.

2 Likes

Throughout this thread, I have summarised and found people’s biggest issues with this product: price and safety. I will go over each of these issues as detailed and as openly as I possibly can.

For the safety issue, I am glad to inform everyone that we now have the CE and RoHS certificates to our own names so that I can share them with trusted and interested individuals here. We have tests and certificates done for both CE EMC and CE LVD, as well as RoHS; with these properly done and paid-for certificates, we are already a step ahead of most Aliexpress chargers out there. Outside the laboratory, we have also done hundreds of hours of recorded tests, with some just being about finding any methods of breaking this charger through both proper and improper usage. I know people are unhappy to see the UL and IP pending, and as I explained, it will be financially impossible to get those done legitimately, so we have opted to cease claiming that we comply with these standards (although the testing data fits within the regulation) until this project is financially ready. (I know @DerelictRobot has suggested ETL, so afterwards, I went and checked the pricing for that certificate, too. It indeed is cheaper than UL, but only by 50%, so unfortunately, it is still unviable.) I hope people find the current situation acceptable and trust my roadmap to get more certifications as soon as they are financially viable.

The price issue can be dissected into two sections: the component and manufacturing costs. Quoting the same people again, the efficiency of a charger isn’t coming from the material the MOSFETs are made with alone, as it is instead achieved with most of the components combined, which is done through good designing, thorough testing, and sourcing genuine and well-made parts. The goal of this charger is to be passively cooled in as small a form factor as possible that will be somewhat affordable, meaning it is vital for us to get its efficiency as high as possible. I am glad to report that we yielded a 96% efficiency, which allows the charger to work at full capacity long enough before thermal throttling. (In our previous engineering samples, we actually had a couple of prototypes which yielded an astonishing 98.5% efficiency, but the material cost for that BOM would just be completely unacceptable, all this is to say that we already made some trade-offs in order to make this product a reality.) Obviously, excellent quality components don’t come as cheaply as the components seen on Aliexpress chargers which only have to be okay enough to work. For us, not only did the components have to work, but they had to work well.

The manufacturing cost has to do with how these chargers get made. Since these aren’t and can’t be made by some random uni intern doing hand soldering, they are all crafted through proper factories providing SMT services, which is very expensive for smaller quantities (the operators would need to rearrange the machines, draft and design the print order, manually load all the components into the trays, and the actual printing/mounting is done really quickly, way too quick for just making these chargers in hundreds. The hassle is only worth doing in quantities of at least thousands or even tens/hundreds of thousands in order for the factories not to charge the setup fee. The quantity issue alone is hindering this charger from being made cheaply.

However, these are KNOWN issues for the cost, and the solution is also KNOWN, which is simply to make more at once. At 1000 pieces, with both the SMT re-purposing their machines for the charger less costly, as well as the cheaper components due to larger order quantity, the unit cost will be down to around $125 from the $200 it is now, adding in the shipping costs, the price is going to look much better at around $150 per charger. Compared to the $80 Aliexpress charger, the initial pricing of $300 seems insanely high, but at $150, it suddenly looks like all the benefits our charger provides can justify the price premiere a bit easier.

The only issue that’s left now is whether we will get 1000 or at least 600 - 800 orders or not have enough quantity made for the price to go down (and then nobody buys these).

I have broken down the finances as detailed and as openly as possible, and I hope this can answer and explain the issues you guys have had with this product. Please let me know if you disagree or find some of the logic above incomprehensible, and give me some new ideas/approaches/recommendations.

yes, cool.

Screw the IP rating - saves money
Screw the potting - saves money and 800g
Put in quality Fan - quiet and effective cooling.

Win win

4 Likes

done

4 Likes

What about this?