Most 4.12 VESC are the same PCB actually, so they generally do. But I am not sure. They could have different sized capacitors on them.
Archive listing here
The TB 4.12 I have measures 120x40x20 (excludes phase wires, includes capacitors), so 10mm longer than the Flipsky
Awesome man, thanks!
AWG gauge | Conductor Diameter Inches | Conductor Diameter mm | Conductor cross section in mm2 | Ohms per 1000 ft. | Ohms per km | Maximum amps for chassis wiring | Maximum amps for power transmission |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0000 | 0.46 | 11.684 | 107 | 0.049 | 0.16072 | 380 | 302 |
000 | 0.4096 | 10.40384 | 84.9 | 0.0618 | 0.202704 | 328 | 239 |
00 | 0.3648 | 9.26592 | 67.4 | 0.0779 | 0.255512 | 283 | 190 |
0 | 0.3249 | 8.25246 | 53.5 | 0.0983 | 0.322424 | 245 | 150 |
1 | 0.2893 | 7.34822 | 42.4 | 0.1239 | 0.406392 | 211 | 119 |
2 | 0.2576 | 6.54304 | 33.6 | 0.1563 | 0.512664 | 181 | 94 |
3 | 0.2294 | 5.82676 | 26.7 | 0.197 | 0.64616 | 158 | 75 |
4 | 0.2043 | 5.18922 | 21.1 | 0.2485 | 0.81508 | 135 | 60 |
5 | 0.1819 | 4.62026 | 16.8 | 0.3133 | 1.027624 | 118 | 47 |
6 | 0.162 | 4.1148 | 13.3 | 0.3951 | 1.295928 | 101 | 37 |
7 | 0.1443 | 3.66522 | 10.6 | 0.4982 | 1.634096 | 89 | 30 |
8 | 0.1285 | 3.2639 | 8.37 | 0.6282 | 2.060496 | 73 | 24 |
9 | 0.1144 | 2.90576 | 6.63 | 0.7921 | 2.598088 | 64 | 19 |
10 | 0.1019 | 2.58826 | 5.26 | 0.9989 | 3.276392 | 55 | 15 |
11 | 0.0907 | 2.30378 | 4.17 | 1.26 | 4.1328 | 47 | 12 |
12 | 0.0808 | 2.05232 | 3.31 | 1.588 | 5.20864 | 41 | 9.3 |
13 | 0.072 | 1.8288 | 2.63 | 2.003 | 6.56984 | 35 | 7.4 |
14 | 0.0641 | 1.62814 | 2.08 | 2.525 | 8.282 | 32 | 5.9 |
15 | 0.0571 | 1.45034 | 1.65 | 3.184 | 10.44352 | 28 | 4.7 |
16 | 0.0508 | 1.29032 | 1.31 | 4.016 | 13.17248 | 22 | 3.7 |
17 | 0.0453 | 1.15062 | 1.04 | 5.064 | 16.60992 | 19 | 2.9 |
18 | 0.0403 | 1.02362 | 0.823 | 6.385 | 20.9428 | 16 | 2.3 |
19 | 0.0359 | 0.91186 | 0.653 | 8.051 | 26.40728 | 14 | 1.8 |
20 | 0.032 | 0.8128 | 0.519 | 10.15 | 33.292 | 11 | 1.5 |
21 | 0.0285 | 0.7239 | 0.412 | 12.8 | 41.984 | 9 | 1.2 |
22 | 0.0253 | 0.64516 | 0.327 | 16.14 | 52.9392 | 7 | 0.92 |
23 | 0.0226 | 0.57404 | 0.259 | 20.36 | 66.7808 | 4.7 | 0.729 |
24 | 0.0201 | 0.51054 | 0.205 | 25.67 | 84.1976 | 3.5 | 0.577 |
25 | 0.0179 | 0.45466 | 0.162 | 32.37 | 106.1736 | 2.7 | 0.457 |
26 | 0.0159 | 0.40386 | 0.128 | 40.81 | 133.8568 | 2.2 | 0.361 |
27 | 0.0142 | 0.36068 | 0.102 | 51.47 | 168.8216 | 1.7 | 0.288 |
28 | 0.0126 | 0.32004 | 0.08 | 64.9 | 212.872 | 1.4 | 0.226 |
29 | 0.0113 | 0.28702 | 0.0647 | 81.83 | 268.4024 | 1.2 | 0.182 |
30 | 0.01 | 0.254 | 0.0507 | 103.2 | 338.496 | 0.86 | 0.142 |
That’s only for copper.
More information:
Added
updated a probably useless code table for wera bits
That isn’t useless; I have needed that before! Thank you
Molicel date codes batch year
Search terms: weld center of cell, do not weld, avoid areas, internal, negative can, diameter, spot weld
@Boardnamics can you confirm this? Need to redesign my motor mounts because they don’t properly fit the precision profile. My profile measurements are slightly different.
It is correct.
Why is the height 18.31 instead of a nice round 18 to make the bounding box square?
18.31mm is stronger than 18.00mm
And 19x19 is extra strong
Would need all new clamps for mounts n gear drives. I feel like its a pretty insignificant issue.
Definitely not an issue, but usually numbers like that are rounded and I’m curious what the justification was
Its not imperial and it’s not a 40° slope
They’re an interpolation of caliber profile. Caliber is 18mm wide, but the arch is such that an 18mm square wouldn’t quite fit inside.
This cross section is maximized.